Posts Tagged ‘Statistics’

Cancer Statistics

There are different types of cancer statistics. Statistics on incidence of cancer show the number of newly diagnosed cases during a specific period of time. Mortality statistics indicate the number of deaths during a specific period of time. A statistic on prevalence gives the number of new and pre-existing cases for people with cancer who are alive on a certain date.

Statistics on survival normally give the proportion of patients with cancer alive at some point subsequent to the diagnosis of their cancer. For example the overall five-year survival rate for colon cancer is 62 percent in America and 43 percent in Europe.

The survival rate for breast cancer in women under the age of 40 is slightly less than the survival rate for women above the age of 40.This cancer statistic can be attributed to the fact that women under the age of 40 develop cancers that grow more aggressively.

Statistics on lifetime risk of cancer give the probability of developing or dying of cancer while statistics by race or ethnicity give the spread of cancer among people of different races or people of certain ethnic backgrounds. For example the survival rate for cancer among white people in the United States between 1992 and 1999 was 64 percent while that of African Americans was 53 percent. This was according to a report done in 2004 by Cancer Facts and American Cancer Society. In 2001, cancer was ranked the second cause of death in the United States. Cancer statistics can also be done based on sex, age and year of diagnosis.

Why doesn’t the media use these statistics. If Americans knew the whole truth would we think our health ,,,,?

…. care system is broken? No one goes to the UK or Canada when they are sick.
When liberals say the health care in the US is broken they are repeating accepted state run media talking points. liberals like to use the World Health Organization statistics that when you understand the whole story are completely erroneous:
The WHO lists US as 37th in life expectancy.
What they don’t say, is that they take into account traffic deaths, homicide, military fatalities. Without those statistics we are first. On the other hand, as for our mortality rate we survive Breast Cancer 52% better than Germany and 88% better than UK. For Prostrate Cancer the US survives 604% better than the UK and 457% better than Norway. Spread these facts around. Nobody ever goes to the UK or Canada for surgical procedures.
Abob.Faux Man …
I am all for an honest debate. However, it seems that Obama and most of his cronies in the House and Senate don’t want an honest debate. They are canceling their town hall meetings and having phone in meetings, and Obama hasn’t even read the bill because he keeps contridicting the content. So YES I totally agree~!!!! lets have an honest debate. Why don’t we get Rush L. & Micheal Medved and the best the Liberals have to offer and each side can ask 5 questions of the other. It will show on all the major networks including ABC if they will agree since they already did their Propaganda piece from the Whitehouse.
Fizzy Bub …
You bring up some good points. It is not that I think America is better because of national pride, far from it. If the Statistics are good,(gathered in a scientific way,) they don’t lie. But you gather statistics unscientifically and you can get them to slant the truth about any way you want to. Common sense, however tells you that for conventional medicine USA is the best. If you want experimental stuff, Mexico, or even Russia might be better, and I am not saying some alternative approaches don’t have valididity.
Bonnie … Thank you for this link.
Since the thought police are giving you thumbs down I decided to include it up top.
here’s a link to some shocking content right out of the house bill itself.

http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2009/07/whats-in-healthacre-bill.html

Chatter …
I don’t deny there are good hospitals in the UK and even in Canada. But who wants go there for treatement if they have to wait in line for Several months and possibly even years because the Sociallized medicine has ruined the system? People come here from Canada and the UK because they can actually get treated in a timely fashion, IE before they die. To a person who has a month to live unless they are treated, a 6 month wait for treatment does not do them any good even if it is FREE.

Breast Cancer Facts Statistics

Some foods in these categories have particular benefit and we will explore them in this article.

Breast Cancer Facts Statistics

1. A cancer researcher has found that the higher the amount of selenium in the blood, the lower the rate of cancer. Garlic is an excellent source of selenium along with whole grains.

2. Whole wheat is helpful in preventing cancer of the small intestine and colon. It speeds up the passage of fecal material through the intestines, thus reducing exposure to cancer causing agents.

3. Seeds may lower the risk of certain types of cancer as well. They contain specific enzymes that have cancer fighting properties. This is an important food group to be included in this type of diet.

4. Studies show that vegetables in the cabbage family such as broccoli, Brussels sprouts, cauliflower, kale and mustard greens can impede the growth of cancer and help prevent cancers of the colon and rectum.

Lung Cancer Secrets Revealed Click here

5. Raw carrot juice is a natural solvent for cancer. Juicing this vegetable daily is recommended and is an extremely valuable addition to the right kind of diet.

6. Add parsley to your salads. It is a good source of a nutrient called histidine. This is an amino acid which impedes the development of cancer.

7. Tahitian Noni Juice is a nutrient rich superfood that can be very advantageous to cancer patients. A note of caution should be mentioned here. There have been rare reports of noni juice causing liver damage, so don’t consume more than 3-4 ounces per day. Cancer patients with liver damage should not take this juice.

Adding the above foods to your cancer diet will be advantageous to anyone afflicted with this disease.

lung cancer treatment breakthroughs Click here

Breast Cancer Treatment Statistics

These collections of irrepressible growth of tissue are called tumors or malignant tumors. Breast Cancer Treatment StatisticsHowever, not all tumors are cancerous.

Breast cancer has been diagnosed in large numbers in North America and Europe. In 2001, about 200,000 cases of breast cancer were diagnosed in the United States alone. Every woman has a 1 in 8 risk of developing breast cancer, but the risk of dying from breast cancer is much lower, barely 1 in 28.

The risk of getting breast cancer is generally higher among older women, women with a family history or previous history of breast cancer, women who had radiation therapy in the chest region, women who started their periods before 12 years old, women who had menopause after 50 years old, women who never had children or had them age 30 or older, or women with genetic mutation. In recent times genetic mutations for breast cancer have become a hot topic of research.

Lung Cancer Secrets Revealed Click here

The breast cancer tumor has the following symptoms: lump or thickening that appears on the breast or underarm, changes in the breast’s shape, nipple turned inwards followed by colorless discharge, red or scaled skin or nipple, or ridges on the breast skin.

If a woman experiences any of these symptoms, it does not necessarily mean she has breast cancer. In such a case she should undergo a breast cancer personal check-up. It is estimated that 95% of breast cancer is detected through personal check-up. The breast cancer personal check-up includes checking for lumps in the breasts after each menstrual period, puckering the skin, and checking for nipple retraction or discharge. For consistent result, every woman should do a breast cancer personal check-up at the same time every month. Various other techniques such as mammography, thermography, ultrasonography, computerized tomography scan etc, can also help detect breast cancer.

Breast cancer treatments include surgery that removes cancerous tissues, with breast conservation therapy (BCT) being one such surgery. Other breast cancer treatments include chemotherapy, radiotherapy, hormonal therapy and biologic therapy. Radiotherapy is a common breast cancer treatment, and radiation treatment and chemotherapy may follow surgery to ensure the destruction of the stray cancer cells.

Even after undergoing many or all of these breast cancer treatment measures, unfortunately almost half the women suffer from a recurrence of the disease.

lung cancer treatment breakthroughs Click here

Breast Cancer Men Statistics

Or does it?

Breast Cancer Men Statistics

A recent study of mammography screening for breast cancer found that some invasive cancers might spontaneously regress over time, leaving no sign that they were ever present in a woman’s body.

This leaves us to question if breast cancer is over diagnosed, and therefore over treated.

The research, conducted by Norwegian scientists, used 119,472 female subjects aged 50 to 64 years, who underwent three rounds of mammography (one mammogram every two years) from 1996 to 2001 as part of the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program.

The cancer rates in this group were compared with the cancer rates of 109,784 control subjects who would have been screened if the program existed back in 1992. The control subjects were invited to have a one-time mammogram at the end of the observation period.

The team had expected that no matter when they were detected, the number of breast cancer tumors would ultimately be the same between the regularly screened group and the never screened controls.

As the researchers expected, the 4-year cumulative incidence of invasive breast cancer in the screened group was higher than in the non-screened control group – 1268 vs. 810 cases per one thousand women.

However, the surprise finding of the research was that even after the one time mammography was given to the previously unscreened control group, the six year cumulative incidence of breast cancer in the mammography screened group was still higher – 1909 vs. 1564 cases per one thousand women.

The study authors couldn’t explain this.

There were no obvious differences between the two groups, and since that all important cumulative incidence of cancer in the control group never reached, even after one time screening, the mammography screened group of subjects, it lends support to the idea that some cancers found on repeat scans wouldn’t show up on a single scan at the end of six years.

The study authors note, “This raises the possibility that the natural course of some screen-detected invasive breast cancers is to spontaneously regress.”

Perhaps as many as one in five cancers detected by mammogram might, in fact, spontaneously resolve.

And since two out of three breast cancer tumors are estrogen driven, the drop off of the hormone as women age and go through menopause suggests that cancer cells are naturally starved of the very hormone they need to grow and thrive.

Lung Cancer Secrets Revealed Click here

The tumors might disappear altogether or shrink and lie dormant. The discontinuation of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) as a treatment for menopausal symptoms and the dramatic decrease in breast cancer rates lends fuel to the idea that hormones may fuel the growth of some cancers.

While this study is absolutely not a recommendation to skip your yearly mammogram, it does raise an intriguing question about cancers that may resolve themselves… without our ever knowing or treating them.

“If the spontaneous remission hypothesis is credible, it could cause a major reevaluation in the approach to breast cancer research and treatment,” says cancer expert Dr. Robert M. Kaplan of the University of California, Los Angeles, and Dr. Franz Porzsolt, from the University of Ulm, Germany in a related story that appeared with the study.

In effect, it could in the future lead to an approach that is already used for a well known cancer in men, prostate cancer, where a “Watchful Waiting” approach is sometimes advised.

lung cancer treatment breakthroughs Click here